00:00:05:02 - 00:00:08:42 In this video, we will share what a good response 00:00:08:42 - 00:00:11:42 to a CAF for local government self-assessment might look like. 00:00:12:27 - 00:00:17:16 We will share what an assurer will look for in a self-assessment. 00:00:17:16 - 00:00:19:04 What you might include in a good response 00:00:19:04 - 00:00:23:04 to a contributing outcome or IGP. 00:00:23:04 - 00:00:26:02 The level of detail to include 00:00:26:02 - 00:00:29:20 and what evidence is appropriate. 00:00:29:20 - 00:00:31:49 So when completing 00:00:31:49 - 00:00:36:07 your self-assessment, it's a good idea to think about what an independent 00:00:36:07 - 00:00:40:54 assurer will be looking for. They will consider things like completeness. 00:00:40:54 - 00:00:43:31 So, how complete was the workbook? 00:00:43:31 - 00:00:46:49 Were responses justified with enough evidence? 00:00:46:49 - 00:00:48:28 Relevancy. 00:00:48:28 - 00:00:53:31 For example, how well the response addressed the contributing outcome or IGP. 00:00:53:31 - 00:00:55:19 Consistency. 00:00:55:19 - 00:00:58:19 So is the evidence provided consistent? 00:00:58:19 - 00:01:00:54 Do the responses support the dependencies between 00:01:00:54 - 00:01:02:42 contributing outcomes 00:01:02:43 - 00:01:05:38 and IGP's. 00:01:05:38 - 00:01:07:19 And accuracy. 00:01:07:19 - 00:01:09:48 The assurer will consider your council’s self-assessment 00:01:09:48 - 00:01:12:12 against their own assessment. 00:01:12:13 - 00:01:13:48 Keeping these in mind 00:01:13:48 - 00:01:16:55 will help you produce a good quality self-assessment 00:01:16:55 - 00:01:21:11 and help the assurer make recommendations that better meet your council's needs. 00:01:21:11 - 00:01:25:22 So let's look at the organisational 00:01:25:22 - 00:01:29:06 self-assessment workbook as an example. 00:01:29:06 - 00:01:31:01 To complete your self-assessment, 00:01:31:01 - 00:01:34:42 your CAF team will work through each contributing outcome, 00:01:34:42 - 00:01:37:27 looking at each indicator of good practice 00:01:37:27 - 00:01:39:51 and considering if your council is achieving them. 00:01:39:52 - 00:01:44:05 These build a picture of whether you are meeting the contributing outcomes. 00:01:44:05 - 00:01:46:51 There's a column to indicate whether you think your council 00:01:46:51 - 00:01:49:55 has achieved an outcome or met an IGP. 00:01:49:55 - 00:01:55:26 There's also a column for you to summarise your response to an outcome or IGP. 00:01:55:26 - 00:01:58:26 Remember, the assurer does not work at your council. 00:01:58:26 - 00:02:01:58 So this information is really important for them so they can understand 00:02:01:58 - 00:02:06:42 the context of your council and the controls you have in place. 00:02:06:42 - 00:02:10:31 So a good response will 00:02:10:31 - 00:02:12:21 state whether a contributing outcome 00:02:12:21 - 00:02:15:37 or IGP is met by the council. 00:02:15:37 - 00:02:19:03 Describe how the council believes they have met 00:02:19:03 - 00:02:22:53 or have not met the contributing outcome or IGP. 00:02:22:53 - 00:02:25:09 Confirm whether your council 00:02:25:09 - 00:02:27:26 has any alternative controls in place, 00:02:27:27 - 00:02:29:55 and show how your evidence supports 00:02:29:55 - 00:02:32:24 the stated position for a contributing outcome 00:02:32:24 - 00:02:35:56 and IGP. 00:02:35:56 - 00:02:37:15 In your response, 00:02:37:15 - 00:02:40:33 explain how the contributing outcome and IGP is met, 00:02:40:33 - 00:02:46:16 considering people, processes, technology, 00:02:46:16 - 00:02:50:36 and specific security controls that might be relevant. 00:02:50:36 - 00:02:55:08 So how much detail should you provide? 00:02:55:08 - 00:02:56:34 For some responses, 00:02:56:34 - 00:03:01:18 they might only be succinct, for example, where you have a clear solution in place. 00:03:01:18 - 00:03:05:47 Others might require more context. 00:03:05:47 - 00:03:08:06 Think about what the contributing outcome 00:03:08:06 - 00:03:11:06 or IGP is asking and how you meet it 00:03:11:07 - 00:03:14:02 as a council. 00:03:15:17 - 00:03:17:34 A good question to ask is 00:03:17:34 - 00:03:20:34 does the response give enough organisational context 00:03:20:34 - 00:03:24:19 to the external reviewer outside of your council? 00:03:26:13 - 00:03:29:13 Let's look at some examples in our workbooks. 00:03:30:17 - 00:03:36:59 So the first example is for contributing outcome A1.a, 00:03:36:59 - 00:03:41:01 Board direction. 00:03:41:01 - 00:03:43:56 So this response provides the assurer with the background 00:03:43:56 - 00:03:48:08 they need to understand why it's a cyber security risk and action to review 00:03:48:08 - 00:03:52:13 by the council's board, who is presenting to the board, 00:03:52:13 - 00:03:56:50 and where the board sits in relation to other groups in the council. 00:03:56:50 - 00:03:59:58 This addresses some of the considerations we discussed earlier 00:03:59:58 - 00:04:04:06 about people and processes. 00:04:04:06 - 00:04:05:59 However, as we said, 00:04:05:59 - 00:04:11:18 some responses to contributing outcomes might be more succinct. 00:04:11:18 - 00:04:18:10 So if we take a look at the next principle. 00:04:18:10 - 00:04:20:46 Which is A3 - Asset management 00:04:20:46 - 00:04:25:36 and the first contributing outcome, A3.a - Asset management. 00:04:25:36 - 00:04:27:55 So in our example workbook 00:04:27:55 - 00:04:32:30 you can see we have a more succinct response. 00:04:32:30 - 00:04:33:48 However, this one still 00:04:33:48 - 00:04:37:40 captures what the outcome is asking in terms of data, 00:04:37:40 - 00:04:41:27 people, and systems. 00:04:41:27 - 00:04:44:23 Another point to bear in mind is in your responses 00:04:44:23 - 00:04:50:12 always be specific and avoid vague terms. 00:04:50:12 - 00:04:54:40 So if we look at one of the indicators of good practice 00:04:54:40 - 00:05:00:04 for this outcome. 00:05:00:04 - 00:05:01:27 And the response 00:05:01:27 - 00:05:06:48 says all assets have an inventory and include details like asset number, 00:05:06:48 - 00:05:10:45 owner, data classification, location. 00:05:10:45 - 00:05:13:02 This information is reviewed by the Information 00:05:13:02 - 00:05:16:39 Asset Owner at least once a year. 00:05:16:39 - 00:05:16:43 asset owner at least once a year. 00:05:16:43 - 00:05:18:19 So this is specific 00:05:18:19 - 00:05:21:33 and it's telling us how often a process is reviewed. 00:05:21:33 - 00:05:25:09 In this case once a year. 00:05:25:09 - 00:05:28:10 Try to avoid terms like regularly. 00:05:28:10 - 00:05:30:22 If you know a process is reviewed, 00:05:30:22 - 00:05:36:00 say every three months or six months, then state that. This will provide the assurer 00:05:36:00 - 00:05:40:52 with a clearer picture of your council's cyber resilience. 00:05:43:18 - 00:05:45:37 Another important consideration 00:05:45:37 - 00:05:51:32 is providing the evidence to back up your responses. 00:05:51:32 - 00:05:55:55 So what evidence is appropriate? 00:05:55:55 - 00:05:58:17 Well, it should be existing documents, 00:05:58:17 - 00:06:01:17 for example policies and processes, 00:06:01:17 - 00:06:05:09 incident response plans, service level agreements, 00:06:05:09 - 00:06:09:10 audits or minutes from meetings. 00:06:10:35 - 00:06:12:01 Use the evidence tracker 00:06:12:01 - 00:06:15:09 in the workbook to reference this evidence. 00:06:15:09 - 00:06:18:41 This will help the assurer find and match 00:06:18:41 - 00:06:21:21 evidence to the relevant contributing outcomes 00:06:21:21 - 00:06:24:21 and IGPs. 00:06:25:19 - 00:06:27:19 When sharing evidence, 00:06:27:19 - 00:06:31:03 remember to redact any sensitive information in your evidence. 00:06:31:03 - 00:06:35:11 For example, IP addresses and host names. 00:06:35:11 - 00:06:38:51 Make it as easy as possible for the assurer to locate the evidence. 00:06:38:51 - 00:06:41:02 For example, 00:06:41:02 - 00:06:46:31 if the evidence is part of a long document that you are sharing, 00:06:46:31 - 00:06:49:37 then it might be a good idea to include a screenshot 00:06:49:37 - 00:06:54:18 of the relevant place in the document where the evidence is located 00:06:54:18 - 00:06:57:39 that supports the contributing outcome or IGP. 00:06:59:49 - 00:07:03:59 And always use existing documents. 00:07:03:59 - 00:07:06:59 Don't create new artifacts to use as evidence. 00:07:09:52 - 00:07:10:26 You can find 00:07:10:26 - 00:07:16:11 more examples of evidence on security.gov.uk. 00:07:16:11 - 00:07:18:59 Here's an example of a page for evidence 00:07:18:59 - 00:07:21:59 to provide for organisational self-assessment. 00:07:22:49 - 00:07:26:31 Now it's up to you to decide what counts as evidence. 00:07:26:31 - 00:07:29:04 This list isn’t exhaustive. 00:07:29:04 - 00:07:32:15 If you have evidence from a document 00:07:32:15 - 00:07:36:16 that's not listed here, then you should consider including 00:07:36:16 - 00:07:40:27 that in your self-assessment for the assurer’s consideration.